
Eight years ago, we founded our firm to realize our vision
of how an insolvency practice should be run. We
started the firm to concentrate most of our efforts on
selected engagements in various forms of
representations, including the representation of
debtors, committees, and post-confirmation entities. In
2007 we expanded our vision to include a litigation
department that focuses on engagements in general civil
litigation matters, including complex commercial
litigation, election law, and litigation that arises out
of our representations in the insolvency department.
Our goal is to always create an underlying
infrastructure that will allow us to staff each large
matter in a manner appropriate to the particular
client's needs and to manage cases efficiently from
beginning to end. This approach is particularly
useful in large cases, which often fail to emphasize
client objectives. Too often, we have seen case
strategy driven by a law firm's needs rather than the
client's needs.
One example of the firm's ability to focus on the
client's objectives is MLG's representation of the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and
post-confirmation Trustee in the At Home case
(see Representative
Clients). At Home was a major
multinational corporation that provided cable modem
services and internet content. Debtor's counsel, a
major national firm, employed over 120 of its attorneys
on the At Home matter. A separate
Bondholders' Committee engaged two national firms that
together employed over 90 of their firms' lawyers on the
At Home matter. At the time, MLG
employed only seven attorneys, but was able to secure
excellent results in the At Home case. In only 18
months, MLG's client, the post-confirmation entity,
has paid similarly situated creditors over twice the
distribution projected in the Disclosure Statement and
has done so in record time. These results flowed
directly from the firm's focus on the client's primary
objective: distributions on an aggressive timetable.
To realize our vision of producing beneficial results
for our clients, we have taken several steps.
First, MLG has sought to embrace the potential of
technology. Technology allows us to provide
superior service in a practice often driven by
accounting, finance, communications and data management
issues. Second, MLG only employs attorneys
experienced in these areas of insolvency and litigation
and has developed expertise in hiring and managing
outside firms when needed. When we need
specialists, such as securities or intellectual property
litigation expertise, we hire attorneys with whom we
have relationships. These attorneys are employed
by other firms and are not on the MLG payroll.
We supervise these attorneys, acting essentially as
general counsel, and achieve a high level of client
responsiveness and billing control. Although
MLG does not benefit financially from this
arrangement, we have the advantage of being able to
select the best lawyers available, lawyers who trust us
as valuable clients and are responsive to our clients'
priorities. Finally, MLG has designed itself
to "let lawyers be lawyers," taking maximum
advantage of non-lawyers, such as bookkeepers, CPA's,
and a large non-lawyer staff.
All this leads to our philosophy of packing light and
moving fast, and to our firm motto:
"We strive to provide the best insolvency and
litigation services – client-focused and
flexible."
MLG appropriately staffs larger cases with teams of
attorneys and other staff, such as paralegals, clerical
staff and accountants. We limit the number of core
team members to only those reasonably necessary to get
the job done. We hold the team members accountable
for reporting to the supervising attorney on how their
tasks further the overall case objectives and timetable,
and for performing excellent, effective work on the
timetable.
MLG bills at competitive hourly rates absent some
other arrangement. Of course in creditors'
committee and debtor representations, payment of
compensation is dependent on whether the debtor has
funds available and the success of the firm's work.
Additionally, MLG is aware that hourly billing often
puts in conflict the interests of client and lawyer and
is willing to explore incentive arrangements that bring
into economic alignment the interests of the client and
the lawyer. We are always willing to discuss, at the
outset of a transaction, alternative billing
arrangements in light of the client's business
objectives and ideal timetable, which allows the firm
and the client to reach a shared definition of
"success."
[top]

Insolvency
McNutt Law Group's practice focuses on
providing superior legal services to its clients in all
phases of insolvency. We represent troubled
companies in insolvency workouts outside of bankruptcy
and purchasers of assets of troubled and bankrupt
entities. We represent creditors' committees,
debtors, creditors, post-confirmation entities, and
trustees, as well as clients in business transactions,
commercial litigation matters and bankruptcy litigation
matters. We specialize in the types of litigation
that commonly arise in bankruptcy: contested plan
confirmations, fraudulent transfer actions, preference
actions, relief from stay actions and other contested
matters.
We have extensive experience in cases in the following
insolvency areas:
• e-Commerce/ Technology
• Telecommunications
• Restaurants/ Services Industry
• Franchise
• Real Estate Issues/ Commercial Landlord:
Tenant, Acquisition, Foreclosure, and Other Areas
• Patents/ Other Intellectual Property
• Biotechnology
Litigation
McNutt Law Group's practice provides top-quality,
client focused services for all stages of litigation.
From initial case intake through final disposition our
focus is on achieving the client's objectives
economically and efficiently while providing the highest
quality work product. Our attorneys have
represented businesses and individuals in State and
Federal courts in matters ranging from commercial
disputes to intellectual property, unfair
competition/false advertising, class actions, election
law matters and real estate.
Current and prior clients include:
• Financial Institutions
• Technology Companies
• Pharmaceutical Companies
• Agricultural Enterprises
• Small Businesses
• Real Estate Owners and Developers
• Company Executives
• Restaurants
• Elected Officials
[top]
|